Flores

United States v. Flores

Good Law
551 F. App'x 395
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 2014No. 13-10145California230 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Victor Rodolfo Hernandez Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Hernandez Flores contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors, to respond to his requests for a downward variance and cultural assimilation departure, and to adequately explain the sentence. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court adequately considered the section 3553(a) sentencing factors, responded to Hernandez Flores’s arguments for a variance and departure, and sufficiently explained the sentence imposed. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

We do not consider Hernandez Flores’s argument that the district court failed to properly calculate the Guidelines range and instead created a Guidelines range that would encompass the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.