Amin

Amin v. Mukasey

Good Law
314 F. App'x 30
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 2008No. 04-74693California369 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on May 5, 2008, 276 Fed.Appx. 708 , is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum is being filed concurrently with this order.

Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot.

Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file the petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot because she timely filed the petition for panel rehearing.

*31 MEMORANDUM **

Tjandani Amin, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Amin produced evidence sufficient to establish past persecution. See id. at 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 ; see also Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-17 (9th Cir.2003) (finding that petitioner did not suffer past persecution, although she was pushed,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.