Kelly

Kelly v. Public Utility District No. 2

Good Law
552 F. App'x 663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 2014Nos. 12-35639, 12-35700California486 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County (PUD) and Port of Quincy, Port District No. 1 of Grant County (Port) filed an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s denial of their joint Motion to Compel Arbitration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 9 U.S.C. § 16 (a), and we affirm.

The district court properly determined that both PUD and Port waived their right *664 to compel arbitration. A party seeking to prove a waiver of arbitration must demonstrate: (1) knowledge of an existing right to compel arbitration; (2) acts inconsistent with that existing right; and (3) prejudice to the party opposing arbitration resulting from such inconsistent acts. Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc., 791 F.2d 691, 694 (9th Cir.1986).

PUD and Port were aware of the arbitration clause, and could have compelled arbitration of this dispute at the outset of this litigation. Plaintiffs clearly raised claims under the 1979 lease containing the arbitration clause, both directly and as third party beneficiaries. Particularly given the broad language of the lease, it was not necessary for a dispute to arise between signatories to allow PUD and Port to demand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.