Steshenko

Steshenko v. Mckay

Good Law
552 F. App'x 721
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 2014No. 13-17095California123 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm.

The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude *722 the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.