Martinez-Garcia
Martinez-Garcia v. Holder
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Gustavo Martinez-Garcia and Minerva Zavala Chavez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ orders summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decisions denying their applications for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s physical presence determination, Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006), and review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Zavala Chavez did not establish the requisite hardship for cancellation of removal. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
Zavala Chavez’s contention that the IJ violated due process by misapplying the law to the facts of her case does not state a colorable due process claim. Id.
Contrary to Zavala Chavez’s contention, the IJ’s interpretation of the hardship standard falls within the broad range authorized by the statute. See…