Gabriel de Secaida v. Holder

Good Law
314 F. App'x 942
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 2009No. 06-74323California192 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Elida Gabriel de Secaida, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the agency’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Gabriel de Secaida failed to establish that “Guatemalan women who resist sexual violence and are assertive in their efforts to resist and to punish those responsible” is a particular social group. See id. at 1170-71 (“Key to establishing a “particular social group” is ensuring that the group is narrowly defined.”). Gabriel de Secaida has therefore failed to demonstrate that she suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. See id. Accordingly, we deny her asylum claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.