Hilton

MEMORANDUM ***

Saskia V.W. Hilton, M.D. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego Diagnostic Radiology Medical Group, and the individually named defendants (collectively, the “defendants”) on her claims that the defendants violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman AntiTrust Act and the California Cartwright Act. We affirm.

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, evaluating the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Austin v. McNamara, 979 F.2d 728, 733 (9th Cir.1992). Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “[A] party seeking summary judgment ... bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its motion, and identifying those portions of [the record,] which it believes demonstrate the absence *609 of a genuine issue of material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265…