Riva

Riva v. Kirkland

Good Law
315 F. App'x 667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 2009No. 06-55124California1,275 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Robbie James Riva was convicted by a California Superior Court jury of attempted voluntary manslaughter, assault with a firearm, and shooting at an occupied motor vehicle. He appealed, the California Court of Appeal affirmed and the California Supreme Court denied review. Riva petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district judge denied the petition and Riva timely appealed.

This court issued a certificate of appeal-ability limited to the two following issues: (1) whether the trial court erroneously admitted incriminating statements obtained as a result of the re-initiation of questioning after Riva expressed a desire to remain silent, in violation of Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 104 , 96 S.Ct. 321 , 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); and (2) whether the admission of a statement made by an unidentified witness violated the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 52-53 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). We review the district court’s denial of habeas corpus de novo. Williams v. Runnels, 432 F.3d 1102, 1105 (9th Cir.2006).

Riva argues that his second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.