Goodman

MEMORANDUM *

Tyra Goodman appeals the district court’s judgment revoking her supervised release and sentencing her to a term of twelve months in custody. Specifically, Goodman contests the district court’s finding that she violated the terms of her release conditions as set forth in allegation one of her Probation Officer’s Petition For a Bench Warrant. We review a district court’s decision to revoke a term of supervised release for abuse of discretion. 1 United States v. Verduzeo, 330 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2003). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that Goodman violated her release conditions as described in allegation one, and so we affirm.

Goodman’s conditions of supervised release prohibit her from “engaging], as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving loan programs, telemarketing activities, investment programs or any other business involving the solicitation of funds or cold-calls to customers without the express approval of the Probation Officer.” Goodman’s probation officer charged that Goodman violated this condition by signing a contract in which she agreed to take out a loan from another party for…

concurring:

I concur in the result.