Limanto
Limanto v. Mukasey
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Susy Wahjuningsih Limanto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and Limanto’s husband, Januar Abadi, and two children (“the Abadis”) petition for review of the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the denial of an application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under CAT, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petitions for review.
The IJ denied Limanto’s asylum application as time barred. Limanto does not challenge this finding.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that the harm Li-manto suffered did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1181-82 (9th Cir.2003). Even if the…