Singh

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal, and denying petitioner’s motion to remand to seek adjustment of status.

We have reviewed the response to the court’s order to show cause, and we conclude that petitioner has failed to raise *669 a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over the agency’s hardship determination. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926 (9th Cir.2005); Torr es-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the court dismisses this petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003). We summarily deny the petition for review in part because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United…