Kesapyan

Kesapyan v. Holder

Good Law
319 F. App'x 534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 2009No. 06-71485California457 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ashot Kesapyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *535 nying his motion to remand to apply for adjustment of status, and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 .

We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), we review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 992-93 (9th Cir.2003), and we review de novo due process claims, Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Kesapyan submitted a fraudulent letter documenting that he was a member of a church in Armenia and this went to the heart of his claim. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.