Kesapyan
Kesapyan v. Holder
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ashot Kesapyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order de *535 nying his motion to remand to apply for adjustment of status, and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 .
We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), we review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 992-93 (9th Cir.2003), and we review de novo due process claims, Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Kesapyan submitted a fraudulent letter documenting that he was a member of a church in Armenia and this went to the heart of his claim. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because…