Jiabao Liu v. Holder

Good Law
320 F. App'x 758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 2009No. 06-71648California270 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jiabao Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based upon Liu’s memory lapses and unresponsive testimony, see id. at 1151 , Liu’s inability to explain Falun Gong exercise movements, see Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004), and Liu’s omission from his initial testimony that he was subject to electrical shock during his detention, see Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-64 (9th Cir.2004). Because the record does not compel the conclusion that Liu’s testimony was credible, he has not established eligibility for asylum. See Singfa-Kaur, 183 F.3d at 1153 .

Because Liu failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.