22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T457,*802 MEMORANDUM ** The BIA correctly found that petitioner could have been sentenced to a year in jail for his conviction under Cal.Penal Code § 245(a)(1), as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(i). See CaLPenal Code § 19 (prescribing the available punishments for misdemeanors “[ejxcept in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any law of this state”); Cal.Penal Code § 245(a)(1) (authorizing punishment of up to one year in county jail). However, petitioner challenged before the IJ whether his conviction was for a crime involving moral turpitude, and the BIA issued a Burbano affirmance of the IJ’s decision. Petitioner thus exhausted his administrative remedies. See Arreguin-Moreno v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.2008). We therefore remand to the BIA to reconsider, in light of Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder, 558 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2009) and In re Silva-Trevino, 24 I. & N. Dec. 687 (A.G.2008), whether petitioner was convicted of a CIMT. PETITION GRANTED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T472,

*802 MEMORANDUM **

The BIA correctly found that petitioner could have been sentenced to a year in jail for his conviction under Cal.Penal Code § 245(a)(1), as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(i). See CaLPenal Code § 19 (prescribing the available punishments for misdemeanors “[ejxcept in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any law of this state”); Cal.Penal Code § 245(a)(1) (authorizing punishment of up to one year in county jail).

However, petitioner challenged before the IJ whether his conviction was for a crime involving moral turpitude, and the BIA issued a Burbano affirmance of the IJ’s decision. Petitioner thus exhausted his administrative remedies. See Arreguin-Moreno v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.2008). We therefore remand to the BIA to reconsider, in light of Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder, 558 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2009) and In re Silva-Trevino, 24 I. & N. Dec. 687 (A.G.2008), whether petitioner was convicted of a CIMT.

PETITION GRANTED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.