Green
Green v. California Court Apartments LLC
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Riccardo Green and Imelda Abrego (“appellants”) appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment for their former landlord (“Apartments”) in their action alleging housing discrimination in violation of state and federal law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion denial of a motion to recuse. Yagman v. Republic Ins., 987 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir.1993). We review summary judgment de novo. DuBois v. Assoc. of Apartment Owners of 2987 Kalakaua, 453 F.3d 1175 , 1178 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellants’ mo *591 tion for recusal, because no “reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Clemens v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 428 F.3d 1175, 1178 (9th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
The district court properly granted summary judgment on appellants’ discrimination claims because appellants failed to raise a triable issue as to whether Apartments or its agents acted with any discriminatory intent during the events at…