Dala

Dala v. Holder

Good Law
322 F. App'x 559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 2009No. 06-74406California305 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Romie Dala, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual determinations and we will reverse only if any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Dala established extraordinary or changed circumstances to excuse his untimely filed asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4 (a)(4), (5); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 657-58 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to the asylum claim.

*560 The agency erred by refusing to consider the evidence regarding whether Dala belonged to a disfavored group in assessing his withholding of removal claim, so we remand to the BIA for reconsideration of this claim. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.