Tjahjadi

Tjahjadi v. Holder

Good Law
322 F. App'x 562
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 2009No. 06-74272California419 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ratnasari Tjahjadi, her husband Sukris-no Djojo, and their minor children, natives and citizens of. Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and denying her motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual determinations and we will reverse only if any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. Malhi v. INS, 336 *564 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The agency denied petitioners’ asylum application as time barred. Petitioners do not challenge this finding in their opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Tjahjadi failed to establish past persecution because the two minor attacks and general discrimination and harassment she experienced as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.