Barreras

Barreras v. Holder

Good Law
324 F. App'x 552
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 2009No. 08-73222California296 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of the BIA’s April 24, 2008 order. The BIA found that the Immigration Judge properly determined that petitioner was not statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal because he does not have a qualifying relative.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration because the motion failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the BIA’s April 24, 2008 order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1); see also Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227 , 1230 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc).

Moreover, a review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner has presented no evidence that petitioner has a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2002). The BIA therefore correctly concluded that, as a matter of law, petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal. Accordingly,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.