Cachay-Soriano

Cachay-Soriano v. Holder

Good Law
329 F. App'x 163
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 2009No. 05-70269California231 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Daniel Cachay-Soriano, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008), and we grant the petition for review.

We remand to the BIA to consider whether Cachay-Soriano was targeted on account of his membership in. a particular social group consisting of family members of his brother-in-law, Pedro Benavides. See Gonzales v. Thomas, 547 U.S. 183, 186-87 , 126 S.Ct. 1613 , 164 L.Ed.2d 358 (2006); INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 , 123 S.Ct. 353 , 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

Moreover, the BIA failed to address whether internal relocation is reasonable and it is unclear whether internal relocation is a question of fact, subject to clear error review by the BIA, or a question of law, subject to de no review by the BIA, so we remand on this issue as well. See Brezilien v. Holder, 569 F.3d 403, 413-15 (9th Cir.2009); Ventura, 537 U.S. at 16-18 ,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.