Cisneros-Ramirez

United States v. Cisneros-Ramirez

Good Law
329 F. App'x 735
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 2009No. 08-50223California146 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Arturo Cisneros-Ramirez appeals from the 240-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams and more of methamphetamine and for laundering monetary instruments, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Cisneros-Ramirez contends his sentence is unreasonable because the district court improperly weighed some of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). The district court did not procedurally err and the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 990-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.