Jirong Sheng v. Holder

Good Law
329 F. App'x 761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 2009No. 06-73069California252 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jirong Sheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an *762 immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Don v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir.2007), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on a material omission from her asylum declaration that the Chinese government had accused her of having allegiance to Falun Gong. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on an inconsistency between Sheng’s testimony and her asylum declaration regarding whether the police used force to disperse a protest that Sheng attended. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001).

In the absence of credible testimony, Sheng failed to establish she is eligible for asylum or withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.