Garcia

Garcia v. McGrath

Good Law
329 F. App'x 786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 2009No. 07-16997California246 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Garcia, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials subjected him to excessive force and were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the excessive force claim because Garcia failed to raise a triable issue as to whether prison guards acted “maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm” by using direct impact rounds and pepper spray after Garcia repeatedly refused to comply with orders to be handcuffed to facilitate his transfer to another prison cell. See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6-7 , 112 S.Ct. 995 , 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the deliberate indifference to medical needs claim because Garcia’s dissatisfaction with the medical treatment that he received constituted, at most, a difference of medical opinion, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.