People v. Department of Energy

Good Law
330 F. App'x 697
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 2009Nos. 07-74819, 07-74836, 08-70807California249 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER *

The court is in receipt of the parties’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice to Reinstatement. The motion is granted and these petitions are dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement in the event that respondents do not conduct a review of the standards for liquid-immersed and medium-voltage dry-type distribution transformers and publish in the Federal Register, no later than October 1, 2011, either a determination pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, that standards for these products do not need to be amended or a notice of proposed rule-making including any new proposed standards for these products. The parties agree that any proposed rule shall meet all applicable requirements under Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 6291-6317 , and National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 4321 -1370f.

Reinstatement shall be by notice filed by any party in this court, with a copy served on the Chief Circuit Mediator and on the other parties within 28 days after October 1, 2011, but in any event by October 28, 2011. If no notice of reinstatement is filed and served by October 28, 2011, the petitions will be deemed dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.