Navarrete

MEMORANDUM *

Ayda Navarrete (“Navarrete”) sued Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3; 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ; and Oregon state law. She alleged discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment based on race, color, national origin, and gender. She also alleged that Nike violated Oregon state law prohibiting wrongful discharge, intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”), and reckless infliction of emotional distress (“RIED”). The district court dismissed *406 Navarrete’s claims for wrongful discharge and RIED for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court later granted summary judgment to Nike on all of Na-varrete’s remaining claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm the district court’s orders on all of Navarrete’s claims.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Nike on Navarrete’s hostile work environment sexual harassment claim. Navarrete failed to provide evidence to support this claim. She did not show that Nike managers knew or should have known of Lang’s sexual harassment and that Nike failed to stop it.

The district court did not err…