22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T46d,MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Hernandez-Curiel appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *419 § 1291 , and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Hernandez-Curiel contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by failing to address his non-frivolous arguments or adequately explain his sentence. The district court, did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). We remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b). See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)(2)). AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T48d,

MEMORANDUM **

Alejandro Hernandez-Curiel appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *419 § 1291 , and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Hernandez-Curiel contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by failing to address his non-frivolous arguments or adequately explain his sentence. The district court, did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

We remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b). See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)(2)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.