Pacheco

United States v. Pacheco

Good Law
333 F. App'x 197
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 2009No. 07-10357California363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Juan Pacheco was convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 63 months for illegal re-entry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We affirm both the conviction and the sentence.

Pacheco contends that the district court should have dismissed his indictment because the immigration judge (“IJ”) at his deportation proceeding in 2000 violated his due process rights when he failed to inform him of his eligibility for § 212(c) relief. The district court assumed that a due process violation had occurred, but found that Pacheco did not show prejudice in the form of plausible grounds for relief under § 212(c). See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Valeno, 342 F.3d 1051, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2003). Given Pacheco’s extensive criminal history as well as the lack of credible evidence regarding family or property ties, employment, or successful rehabilitation at the tune of his deportation proceedings, we affirm the district court’s conclusion regarding prejudice.

The district court also committed no reversible error in sentencing Pacheco to a term of imprisonment of 63 months. According to Pacheco, the district court did not adequately consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.