Cervantes Vasquez v. Holder

Good Law
333 F. App'x 298
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 2009No. 07-70769California328 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Cervantes Vasquez and his wife, Laura Cervantes, natives and citizens *299 of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for cancellation of removal, and denying their motion to remand removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and for substantial evidence findings of fact regarding counsel’s ineffective assistance, Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir.2004). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Cervantes Vasquez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005); de Lourdes v. Mukasey, 539 F.3d 1102, 1106-07 (9th Cir.2008).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Cervantes Vasquez did not establish his prior counsel’s ineffectiveness because Cervantes Vasquez did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.