22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T4ae,*856 MEMORANDUM ** Oscar Castillo-Ramirez appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(II). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Castillo-Ramirez contends the district court proeedurally erred by: (1) declining to compare his conduct to similar conduct in other cases; (2) failing to provide sufficient reasons for imposing a sentence six months above the Guidelines range; and (3) relying on clearly erroneous facts. These contentions are belied by the record. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Castillo-Ramirez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances of this case and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); Carty, 520 F.3d at 991-93 . AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T4ce,

*856 MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Castillo-Ramirez appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(II). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Castillo-Ramirez contends the district court proeedurally erred by: (1) declining to compare his conduct to similar conduct in other cases; (2) failing to provide sufficient reasons for imposing a sentence six months above the Guidelines range; and (3) relying on clearly erroneous facts. These contentions are belied by the record. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Castillo-Ramirez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances of this case and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); Carty, 520 F.3d at 991-93 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.