Jagidshbhai

Jagidshbhai v. Holder

Good Law
336 F. App'x 696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 2009No. 07-70230California272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Saroj Ben Patel Jagidshbhai, native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review findings of fact for substantial evidence, Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Patel failed to establish past persecution and a well-founded fear of future persecution because she has not shown that the Indian government was unwilling or unable to protect her from Muslims. See id. at 1154 . Her fear of future persecution is further undermined because she remained in the state of Gujarat, India over two years after she suffered incidents of harm during the 2004 riots, see Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and because her similarly situated family members reside unharmed in India, see Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001).

Because Patel has not met the standard for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.