Stefani

United States v. Stefani

Good Law
338 F. App'x 579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2009No. 07-50525California364 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Anthony Todd Stefani appeals his sentence of twenty-seven months following a jury trial and conviction for conspiracy to defraud the IRS, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and aiding and assisting in the filing of false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (2). We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here except as necessary to explain our decision.

We reject Stefani’s argument that the district court abused its discretion under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 and violated Stefani’s due process rights by admitting testimonial hearsay evidence relying on charts and summarizing data. The underlying data regarding national tax return statistics was admissible in this case under Olender v. United States, 210 F.2d 795 (9th Cir.1954), which explains *581 that “all documents prepared by public law or required by the nature of their offices are admissible as proof of the facts stated therein.” Id. at 801 . Further, the charts were relevant to show that the average charitable contribution of the tax returns Stefani prepared was much higher than the national average, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.