Lazo-Portillo

Lazo-Portillo v. Holder

Good Law
338 F. App'x 630
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 2009No. 08-70621California295 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raul Antonio Lazo-Portillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review factual findings for substantial evidence, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008), and deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Lazo-Portillo failed to show his alleged persecutors threatened him on account of a protected ground. His fear of future persecution based on an actual or imputed anti-gang or anti-crime opinion is not on account of the protected ground of either membership in a particular social group, see id. at 745-46 (holding that the group of young men in El Salvador resisting gang violence is too loosely defined to meet the requirement for par *632 ticularity), or political opinion, see id. at 747 (affirming Board’s determination that “general aversion to gangs does not constitute a political…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.