Hao Wu v. Holder

Good Law
338 F. App'x 686
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 2009No. 06-70554California324 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hao Wu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence adverse credibility findings, Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999), and we review de novo due process claims, Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss in part, and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Wu failed to establish changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application because the underlying facts are disputed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3); cf. Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 653-54 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition as to Wu’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based upon a discrepancy between Wu’s testimony and his asylum application regarding whether he was beaten in connection with his first interrogation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.