Pascoal

Pascoal v. Holder

Good Law
338 F. App'x 693
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 2009No. 06-72737California274 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Denny Adrie Pascoal, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review.

The BIA denied Pascoal’s asylum claim as time-barred. Pascoal does not challenge this finding in his opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Pascoal failed to establish he suffered past persecution in Indonesia. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 *694 (9th Cir.2003). The BIA, however, erred by refusing to consider the evidence regarding whether Pascoal belonged to a disfavored group in assessing his withholding of removal claim, so we remand for reconsideration of this claim. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2009); INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 , 123 S.Ct. 353 , 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.