Serrano

Serrano v. Holder

Good Law
338 F. App'x 698
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 2009No. 08-72171California261 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Alexander Serrano, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of asylum because Serrano failed to demonstrate that the harms he experienced at the hands of the police were on account of a protected ground, see Alonzo v. INS, 915 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.1990), or that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution by either the police or gang members on account of a protected ground, see Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS, 801 F.2d 1571, 1579-81 (9th Cir. 1987); Arteaga, 511 F.3d at 945-46 (holding that former gang members do not comprise a particular social group).

Because Serrano failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.