Putra

MEMORANDUM **

Yus Putra, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture *825 (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Putra’s experiences did not rise to the level of past persecution, see Nagoulko, 333 F.3d at 1016-18 ; see also Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003), and that the government is not unable or unwilling to control the perpetrators of the harm that Putra fears in the future, see Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1180-81 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc); Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1071-72 (9th Cir.2005). Moreover, even if Putra were a member of a disfavored group under the analysis set forth in Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004), he did not demonstrate the requisite individualized risk of…