Vardanyan

Vardanyan v. Holder

Good Law
341 F. App'x 286
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2009No. 06-70536California290 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gohar Pogosovna Vardanyan, a native of Georgia and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention *288 Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency denied Vardanyan’s asylum application as time-barred. Vardanyan does not challenge this finding in her opening brief. Accordingly, we deny her petition as to the asylum claim.

Even if Vardanyan’s testimony were deemed credible, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal because Vardanyan failed to establish that the harm she experienced in Armenia and the harm she fears upon return are based on a protected ground. See id. In particular, substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Vardanyan did not seek to expose or otherwise investigate corruption inextricably intertwined with a government operation. Cf. Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.