Orudzhyan

Orudzhyan v. Holder

Good Law
341 F. App'x 288
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2009No. 06-73913California250 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vachagan Armenakovich Orudzhyan, a native of Armenia and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Kohli v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1061, 1070-71 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based on the discrepancies between Orudzhyan’s testimony and his asylum application on material issues including his party affiliation and who persecuted him in Russia. See Kohli, 473 F.3d at 1071 (discrepancies between petitioner’s testimony and declaration supported adverse credibility finding). He was unable to explain the discrepancies. See Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1200 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, Orudzhyan’s asylum claim fails.

Because Orudzhyan failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.