Horel
Williams v. Horel
Opinion
Lead Opinion
ORDER
The Memorandum disposition filed May 18, 2009, is amended per the Amended Memorandum filed concurrently with this Order.
Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion for permission to reply to response to the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
The panel has voted to deny Petitioner-Appellant’s petition for rehearing. Judge Hug has recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hawkins and Tallman have voted to deny the en banc petition.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Accordingly, the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be accepted.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM *
Gregory Williams (“Williams”) appeals the denial of his § 2254 habeas corpus petition, arguing the California Court of Appeal applied Supreme Court precedent in an objectively unreasonable manner by concluding that (1) because he did not unequivocally invoke his right to counsel the interrogating officers were permitted to ask clarifying questions leading…