Hernandez

MEMORANDUM **

Andres Ernesto Hernandez appeals pro se from the district court’s final judgment in favor of Defendant Villicana after the jury returned a verdict denying Hernandez’s claim brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We affirm.

The facts of the case are known to the parties and we do not repeat them here.

*381 Hernandez waived his right to challenge on appeal the jury’s verdict because he did not file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). See Nitco Holding Corp. v. Boujikian, 491 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir.2007); Desrosiers v. Flight Int’l of Fla. Inc., 156 F.3d 952 , 956-57 (9th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.