Khella

Khella v. Holder

Good Law
345 F. App'x 266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 2009No. 05-76668California333 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Moheb Zaki Khella, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and denying his motion to continue or administratively close proceedings. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. See Almaghzar v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 915, 920 (9th Cir.2006). We grant in part and deny in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. The record compels the conclusion that the cumulative effect of multiple beatings, detentions, and threats rose to the level of persecution and that Khella was persecuted by state officials and Islamic extremists on account of his religion. See Korablina v. INS, 158 F.3d 1038, 1044 (9th Cir.1998). Accordingly, we grant the petition as to Khella’s asylum and withholding of removal claims. We remand those claims for the agency to apply the presumptions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.