Heng Chhun v. Holder

Good Law
345 F. App'x 309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 2009No. 06-75360California755 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Heng Chhun petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision adopting, supplementing, and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Chhun’s request for asylum, withholding of removal, and deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). The IJ found that Chhun was ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal because she had engaged in terrorist activity through her membership in and work on behalf of the Cambodian Freedom Fighters (“CFF”), and, alternatively, that she was ineligible for either form of relief because she could not show a well-founded fear of persecution or a likelihood of being persecuted on account of a protected ground. The IJ also found that Chhun was ineligible for relief under the CAT because she had not shown that it was more likely than not that she would be tortured upon her return to Cambodia. *311 The BIA affirmed the IJ, supplementing the IJ’s discussion of Chhun’s terrorist activity. Chhun petitions for review of the BIA’s determinations on each issue. We deny her petition.

We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that Chhun is ineligible for asylum because she engaged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.