Starkey

Starkey v. County of San Diego

Good Law
346 F. App'x 146
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 2009No. 09-55044California1,017 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Dr. Alameda Starkey and the San Diego-Imperial County Cattlemen’s Association appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for preliminary injunctive relief in an action against the County of San Diego, the San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use (“DPLU”), and two employees of the DPLU in their official capacities (collectively, “the County”), for violations of their rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and article I of the California Constitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we reverse and remand.

The district court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ request for injunctive relief. “The proper legal standard for preliminary injunctive relief requires a party to demonstrate ‘that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.’ ” Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960, 978 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Winter v. NRDC, Inc., — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008)). Each factor weighs in favor of appellants.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.