Vasquez

*190 MEMORANDUM ***

Frederick J. Vasquez appeals the district court’s order affirming an administrative law judge’s denial of social security benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . The district court’s order is reviewed de novo. Edlund v. Massanari, 253 F.3d 1152, 1156 (9th Cir.2001). The decision may be set aside only if it is based on legal error or unsupported by substantial evidence. Id. If the evidence is subject to different rational interpretations, the ALJ’s decision must be upheld. Id. We affirm.

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Vasquez’s mental and physical conditions do not prevent him from engaging in substantial gainful activity. 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(1)(A); Edlund, 253 F.3d at 1156 . The ALJ found Vasquez’s reported behavior consistent with narcissistic personality traits, not a listed mental impairment. 20 C.F.R. § 404 , subpt. P, app’x 1. The medical records describe Vasquez as an elitist thinker, derogatory toward and critical of others, and unwilling to accept responsibility for social discord. The ALJ was not required to specify the listed mental impairments Vasquez failed to meet. Gonzalez v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 1197,…