Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. KXD Technology, Inc.

Good Law
347 F. App'x 275
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 2009No. 08-16794California329 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Sungale Group, Inc., Sungale Electronics, Ltd., and Amoisonic Electronics, Inc. (collectively Sungale) appeal the district court’s entry of default judgment against them and award of $1,000,000 in statutory damages to Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered case dispositive sanctions against Sungale. See Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. New Images of Beverly Hills, 482 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2007). The district court found that Sun-gale deliberately destroyed its computer server, and with it electronic records Philips requested; this destruction demonstrated the “willfulness, bad faith, and fault” required to support terminating sanctions. Id. Sungale’s failure to produce requested documents prejudiced Philips, and this failure was not excused by the fact that Philips possessed some of the requested documents by virtue of the U.S. Marshals’ seizure of Sungale’s business records. See Computer Task Group, Inc. v. Brotby, 364 F.3d 1112, 1116-17 (9th Cir.2004). Finally, the district court initially considered and awarded less severe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.