Nelson v. Attorney General of Nevada

Good Law
350 F. App'x 134
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 2009No. 08-15829California240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Jimmy Lee Nelson appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely filed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

Nelson contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the AEDPA’s one-year limitation period. He also contends that the district court abused its discretion when it denied Nelson’s request for an evidentiary hearing on this claim.

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Nelson’s medical records do not establish a basis for equitable tolling or for an evidentiary hearing. Nelson failed to demonstrate that his mental and physical medical conditions constitute extraordinary circumstances that made it impossible for him to file his federal habeas petition within AEDPA’s one-year filing deadline, or that he diligently pursued his case. See Bryant v. Arizona Atty. Gen., 499 F.3d 1056, 1061 (9th Cir.2007). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Nelson’s request for an evidentiary hearing. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (c)(2); Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 591 (9th Cir.2004) (no evidentiary hearing is warranted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.