Skhvitaridze

Skhvitaridze v. Holder

Good Law
350 F. App'x 139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 2009No. 05-74358California328 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Nodar Skhvitaridze (“Skhvitaridze”), a native and citizen of Georgia, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying asylum and withholding of removal. Skhvitaridze sought asylum and withholding of removal on the basis of his fear of persecution.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We conclude that the IJ erred in requiring corroborating evidence and that the error was not harmless. Therefore, we grant the petition and remand.

The law in this circuit is well settled that “an alien’s testimony, if unrefuted and credible, direct and specific, is sufficient to establish the facts testified without the need for any corroboration.” Ladha v. INS, 215 F.3d 889, 901 (9th Cir.2000), overruled on other grounds by Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1208 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc); see also Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 992 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that “this court does not require corroborative evidence”). “When an alien credibly testifies to certain facts, those facts are deemed true, and the question remaining to be answered becomes whether these facts, and their reasonable inferences,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.