Jordan
United States v. Jordan
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Defendants Dominic Davis (“Davis”), Harlon Jordan (“Jordan”), and Kurt Myrie (“Myrie”) appeal their convictions and My-rie his sentence for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery, and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, all arising in connection with the June 2006 robbery of the Colonial Bank in Las Vegas, Nevada. We affirm.
I. Appeal Nos. 08-10205 and 08-10233 (Defendants Davis and Jordan)
A. Special Verdict Forms
The district court properly instructed the jury on the crimes charged and on the various theories of liability (e.g., substantive liability, aiding and abetting, Pinkerton 1 ). The court did not abuse its discretion or violate due process by denying the request for a special verdict form to ascertain on which theory the jury convicted because the theory underlying the conviction made no practical difference. Moreover, contrary to defendants’ suggestion, under the instructions given, the jury could not have convicted if it believed Myrie’s testimony. Even under an aiding and abetting theory for Count 2, the jury would have to find that defendants directly facilitated or encouraged the use or carrying of a…