Yan Jiang v. Holder

Good Law
367 F. App'x 828
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 2010No. 07-72203California345 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Yan Jiang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Telele v. Mtileasey, 533 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir.2008), and review de novo claims of due process violations, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Jiang’s asylum application was untimely because that finding is based on disputed facts. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3); cf. Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (exercising jurisdiction to consider one-year bar where facts were undisputed). Accordingly, we dismiss Jiang’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Jiang testified inconsistently about when she began proselytizing, see Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.