Lucey

Lucey v. Nevada ex. rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education

Good Law
380 F. App'x 608
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 2010No. 09-15996California771 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This case concerns disciplinary sanctions imposed against plaintiff Kevin Lucey for incidents occurring while he was enrolled as a student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (“UNLV’) during the fall 2006 semester.

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of Lucey’s due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of the sanctions imposed at the hearing on December 4, 2006 (“December 4 Hearing”). Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005). We review the district court’s denial of leave to Lucey to amend his complaint for abuse of discretion. Gardner v. Martino, 563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.2009).

On the facts alleged, Lucey’s right to procedural due process at the December 4 Hearing was satisfied because Lucey was subject to sanctions less than suspension or expulsion and received “some kind of notice and [was] afforded some kind of hearing.” Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 579 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). Therefore, the district court properly dismissed Lucey’s § 1983 procedural due process claim concerning the December 4 Hearing. Although Lucey faults the district court for denying leave to amend without reasons, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.