Debonne

Debonne v. Debonne CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2022E074972California4,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

On behalf of himself and his companies, Bernard Debonne sued his son, Yann

Debonne, for claims stemming from Yann’s alleged elder abuse of Bernard. The trial 1 court awarded Bernard , Debonne Asset Management, LLC (DAM), and Debonne

Property Management, Inc. (DPM) about $3.75 million in damages and about $402,600

in attorney’s fees.

Yann argues (1) the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over DAM; (2)

Bernard’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations; (3) the trial court erroneously

excluded various documents as privileged; (4) the trial court erroneously denied Yann’s

motion for a new trial; (5) the trial court awarded excessive damages; and (6) the trial

court improperly calculated Respondents’ attorney’s fees award. We find no error and

affirm.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Bernard ran a successful farming company from 1965 until 2007, when he decided

1 We refer to Bernard and Yann by their first name because of their shared last name. We mean no disrespect. 2 We have had considerable difficulty determining the relevant facts and trial court proceedings because Yann failed to “[p]rovide a summary of the significant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.